Cameras that photograph every passing car, and the networks that decide who gets to search the images. Flock Safety, preventing misuse, auditing the police, and where your license plate location data ends up.
The biggest network belongs to Flock Safety, whose default settings make a city's cameras searchable by agencies nationwide unless someone turns that off. Our reporting here runs from St. Louis Park's audit logs to the biennial Minnesota audits that are supposed to keep these systems honest.
The Minneapolis Police Department is buying mobile license plate readers, the kind mounted on squad cars, and paying for them with forfeiture money. An internal MPD email from a commander in the Administrative Services D
Minnesota Statute 13.824 requires every police department running an automated license plate reader to arrange an independent audit every two years. The results go to the commissioner of administration and the Legislativ
Minnesota law requires an independent audit of every police license plate reader program every two years. The audit exists to create a public record: results go to the Commissioner of Administration and the Legislative C
Two searches of St. Louis Park Police Department's Flock Safety cameras, run in October 2025 by the North Missouri Drug Task Force through Brookfield MO PD, each reached 25,263 networks. A normal nationwide lookup at the
Flock told its law enforcement customers in March that agencies sharing data federally "may receive a data sharing request from the FBI in the coming days," then followed up a week later with a ready-made Q&A for city co
When Capitola PD received a records request about its Flock cameras, Flock sent the department a guide on exemptions, redactions, and fees, then put its legal and external affairs staff on a call with the city the next d
Capitola's police chief negotiated a signed amendment barring Flock Safety from disclosing city data or changing the camera system without her permission, and told the company to expect more amendments at renewal.
At least 25 California law enforcement agencies, from Imperial County on the Mexico border to San Bernardino County, asked to search a ten-camera beach town's Flock network in ten weeks. Capitola was sharing with five.
An April 2026 email from a Flock Safety representative to Oshkosh, Wisconsin police leadership lays out three separate vehicle counts. The public sees the smallest one.
Flock Safety's Transparency Portal is the company's public accountability showcase. It is a page where a police department publishes live figures on how it uses its license plate readers, including a search audit that li
City payment records released through MuckRock show a $1,228,000 purchase of Flock's drone-as-first-responder hardware and software. San Francisco's surveillance technology inventory does not list it.
Arvada PD's Policy 460 (effective June 11, 2025) states in its data retention section that mobile ALPR data "is also retained by LexisNexis Risk Solutions, per agreement with the Arvada Police Department." The department
Initial review of CT state contracts suggests LPR data sharing occurs through a different channel than the standard AVCC/PSDEX pipeline. Needs deeper FOIA + contract analysis to confirm whether CT is contributing, bypass
Reviewing DHS BSIR grant language for FY2025 — several cities used grant funds explicitly for 'interoperable data sharing platforms compatible with national LPR networks.' This may represent a previously undocumented fed
Local Surveillance Report
Tell us where you live and we will look at what surveillance contracts and data pipelines touch your area.
Newsletter
Findings and features, in your inbox.
New findings and monthly features from the FinePrint newsroom. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.