Maple Grove Police Department

What the audit said

No exceptions found across all seven itemized statute controls. Identical control-by-control testing table format to the Coon Rapids and St. Paul LOGIS audits: policy review, agency-provided screen prints (60-day retention confirmed), and staff interviews.

What the audit said

Two-page checklist-style audit of Maple Grove PD's legacy Vigilant ALPR deployment — 2 squad-car units, no stationary cameras — finding the department "in compliance with MN Statue [sic] 13.824" across every evaluated area: policy implementation, role-based access controls, 60-day retention, data classification, authorized inter-agency sharing, public reporting without plate numbers, and BCA notification. No findings, exceptions, deficiencies, or recommendations of any kind are recorded, and the narrative contains no language admitting an unrecorded gap. Department staff "demonstrated how they created these reports" from the Vigilant administrative control panel and audit trail rather than the auditor querying the system independently — the same second-hand methodology flagged on the Crystal PD 2019 LOGIS audit — so Tested Live System is left false.